UDC 34ISSN 2232-7339    e-ISSN 2303-4653
Godišnjak Pravnog fakulteta u Istočnom Sarajevu
Published yearbooks

   2010
      Vol. I No. 1/2010

   2011
      Vol. II No. 1/2011
      Vol. II No. 2/2011

   2012
      Vol. III No. 1/2012
      Vol. III No. 2/2012

   2013
      Vol. IV No. 1/2013
      Vol. IV No. 2/2013

   2014
      Vol. V No. 1/2014

   2015
      Vol. VI No. 1/2015

   2016
      Vol. VII No. 1/2016

   2017
      Vol. VIII No. 1/2017


PROHIBITION OF RETROSPECTIVE APPLICATION OF CRIMINAL LAW IN PRACTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

  PDF Full Text

Anđela Stojanović

Institute of International Politics and Economics, Belgrade

Summary

Article 7 of the Convention is not confined only to prohibition of the retrospective application of the criminal law. The protection it provides is slightly wider and develops through the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Due to the significant impact of the common law, Article 7 cannot be understood in the manner in which the principle of legality is traditionally recognized in the civil law. In practice of the European Court of Human Rights cases of direct violation of the principle of non-retroactivity of criminal laws are extremely rare. The issue of retrospective criminal laws arises in a more indirect way, for example through the institute of continuing offence, or in connection with the autonomous concept of punishment. Significant problem in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights is the retroactive application of stricter laws which are not directly related to criminal offence and punishment, as well as the application of exception in Article 7(2) of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

Key words: European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms; European Court of Human Rights; Prohibition of retrospective criminal laws; Principle of legality.
 

Anđela Stojanović, andjela@diplomacy.bg.ac.rs.